- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Nom runs competing service per [1]. Possible retaliation for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ParentLocker--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 06:13, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Edline (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Advert, no refs, no notabilty, spam links Dab121 (talk) 23:58, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - this is a bad faith nom - user has edited page contents in attempt to get article deleted. See diff -Toon05 00:02, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep per Toon05. ~ Ameliorate U T C @ 00:17, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep per the above two, + regular keep, as the extent of its use, mentioned in the article, provides its notability. umrguy42 01:42, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.