Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edmonton Tool Library

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:47, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edmonton Tool Library

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Upon search, this tool library does not seem to be notable enough to warrant its own article. I find one [1] available reference, but it is mostly a interview. There needs to be multiple reliable, secondary sources that discuss the subject in depth, and it only seems that there is one, for which is borderline. Not to mention, the article creator seems to have a undisclosed WP:COI with the subject, as all of their edits in the mainspace seem to be about the Edmonton Tool Library. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 15:16, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Museums and libraries, Organizations, and Canada. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 15:16, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.