- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Redirect to List of English suffixes Deville (Talk) 02:08, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Kind of a pointless article. The one example given doesn't even follow the "rule" described. If anything, this could be a two sentence blurb in English language. It was speedied, admin changed speedy to prod, which was then removed. To be completely precise and specific, I believe this violates WP:NOT in that Wikipedia is not an indiscrimate collection of information. --Wafulz 19:59, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge into English language. By itself, this is not an encyclopedic topic: it belongs in the foreword to a dictionary, if anything. One (perhaps two) sentence(s) in English language should suffice for encyclopedic purposes. Srose (talk) 20:10, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to List of English suffixes with no merge. The information is there already in a more encyclopedic style. --Metropolitan90 15:51, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, unlikely search term. Recury 00:09, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.