Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Effection: Hellraiser

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy delete. Mushroom (Talk) 15:43, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• The film obviously does not exist. - adnghiem501 07:15, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• IMDB doesn't have it which raises some flags -- Tawker 07:19, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I should note that an user Julian Thome who is listed in the crew is removing this AfD notice despite being warned. They were asked to provide a source that this is actually in production but so far has not. I have no problems keeping this article if a cite can be found but without it is a removal. -- Tawker 07:47, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as hoax... this is waaaay too fishy. Per the user and talk pages of this editor, it's evident that he is nothing more than a teenage vandal, and that this film is clearly some fantasy of his. Also, the same User:Julian Thome has been editing the article of pretty much every single person he's listed on this article to include "Effection"... some damage control and reversions needed there, IMHO. --Kinu ^t/_c 08:13, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Changing vote to super speedy delete: G4 and protect per Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Effection, and the deletion log... nine times? Come on. --Kinu ^t/_c 08:24, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nine?! This guy is obviously just around to be disruptive. Is there a way to get him banned? Hbackman 08:28, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • It's been attempted on a temporary basis... but I think that something more permanent is not unreasonable. I'll let an admin worry about that, though. --Kinu ^t/_c 08:31, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete as patent nonsense. I had a long list of the ridiculous things about this article (18 different distributors listed?!), but what I think takes the cake is that Google finds exactly one page for a search on "Effection: Hellraiser," which is Julian Thome's user page. Hbackman 08:23, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete CSD G4. Also this is telling. -- Samir (the scope) 08:30, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: As a side note, is it just me, or is the synopsis BJAODN material? As much as I don't condone vandalism like this, the Engrish feel to it made me laugh a little: On the Beginning, nine soldiers make a little gag against Cajuns, where will a catastrophical adventure. Then, worldwide are problems with Monsters, Magic, Murder, War, Crime and so on. In Nevada, Los Angeles, Australia and Louisiana must people die, account of this little gag. --Kinu ^t/_c 08:42, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: User:Julian Thome has been adding links to this page to many film-related articles as well, which must be reverted (ie wasting our time). Nationalparks 08:47, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as obvious hoax. Is there anyone in Hollywood who's not in this movie? --CrypticBacon 11:16, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as REALLY obvious hoax, dreamed up by somebody who must have dropped acid after watching Southern Comfort. --Calton | Talk 14:39, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and please ban Julian Thome. They have been adding this film to filmographies of various actors and directors for weeks now, especially Fred Ward. They have been banned before and will likely just come back to recreate this page as well as add the "film" to the filmographies of people yet again if the ban is not permanent. Dismas|^(talk) 15:16, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.