Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ElePaper Action

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 10:12, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ElePaper Action (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

• This seems to be a minor game without any critical coverage. It fails to establish any sort of notability. TTN (talk) 21:23, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • It "seems" unimportant to you and can you be a little more specific about notability.--Ipatrol (talk) 21:32, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • I can't find any reviews for it on major video game sites, so it does not appear to be notable. That seems to be quite clear in the nomination. The lack of critical coverage equals it failing to establish notability. TTN (talk) 21:34, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. It's a nicely-written article, but there's absolutely no evidence here that any reliable sources have ever heard of the game, or considered it notable enough to review. None of the major game sites seems to have an entry for it. Powers ^T 00:03, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 13:52, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to R.O.D the TV, assuming this is an officially licensed title. Marasmusine (talk) 23:49, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• delete the game proves a bit NN, even though I agree the aticle is good.Mrathel (talk) 15:41, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.