Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electrocompressor jet-engine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 01:33, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Electrocompressor jet-engine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Evidently a hoax, term gets zero Google hits. Creator's only other page, Seegorgian, is also up for AfD as a possible hoax. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 20:24, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Incoherent and completely unverifiable. Hqb 20:31, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment User:Ge alchemist has been indefinitely blocked. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 20:56, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - hoax. JohnCD (talk) 21:25, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Ridiculously implausible - freon is a gas at STP; you can't make an engine component out of it. Zetawoof_(ζ) 22:17, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Seems like a pretty evident hoax. --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 22:19, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, complete bollocks. sh¤y 23:25, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete An article that is full of non-exsistent crap. Thundermaster^{Thundermaster's Talk} 11:13, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.