Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electrodynamical theory of Gravitation
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 13:47, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Electrodynamical theory of Gravitation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
unreferenced original research, self-published. (WP:NOT#Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought) - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 07:19, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Unreferenced original research. Qwfp (talk) 08:51, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Seems to be indeed undpublished [1]--Tikiwont (talk) 11:16, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete exceedingly fringe and borderline A1. Even more revealing to me than the lack of hits mentioned above under Scholar are the hits under regular Google. At least we know this has been around since 1997. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 14:25, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 14:25, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Utter nonsense utterly ignored by the relevant community. - Eldereft (cont.) 19:10, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as nonsense. We66er (talk) 20:21, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Original research and completely unsourced. Edward321 (talk) 05:33, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.