Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electromagnetic Light Curvature

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Snowball delete, obvious hoax. Tim Vickers (talk) 23:02, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Electromagnetic Light Curvature (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

No sources since July; fails WP:PROF. Lea (talk) 22:13, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• delete non notable theory, no google scholar results --Asmodeus Samael (talk) 22:21, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per the Crackpot Special: NN, RS, OR, FRINGE. No evidence of the author's existence, much less his "widely debated" theory, in the literature or on the Web. Where'd he publish it, on a birchbark note thrown to sea? Bm gub (talk) 22:29, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.