Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electronic Standard Book Number

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 20:23, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Though I'm a big fan of Numly, I'm afraid this Alexa rank doesn't cut WP:WEB Computerjoe's talk 18:46, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Keep This isn't an article about the website per se, but rather the Electronic Standard Book Number. I think it maintains a fair sense of notability. --Porqin 18:49, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Alexa ranking doesn't matter if the subject matter itself is notable. I'm thinking Numly should probably be deleted and redirected to this, though. Snurks^TC 20:09, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment I have redirected Numly to the ESBN article. ColourBurst 19:52, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep — Omegatron 16:50, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.