Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electronic grade book

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 00:16, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Electronic grade book

Article refers to a product only, no references provided and article is orphaned. Lympathy ^Talk 15:19, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - At first glance, I was checked on the delete side of the book. However, after a few minutes of poking around on Google I found a term that is gaining in Notarity. It turns out there are quite a few news articles concerning the concept, as noted here [1]. Likewise, I was surprised to find the amount of scholarly articles listed on Google Scholar dealing with the concept as shown here [2]]. Finally, I did a quick Google search on products and was rewarded with quite a few, as shown here, [3]. Based on this information, I had to go with keep. I believe we have a concept that is encyclopedic with a nominal rewrite and a few sources added. Anyone willing to help? ShoesssS ^Talk 16:49, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Grade F for failing WP:BEFORE. See talk page for numerous sources. Colonel Warden (talk) 00:26, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- even with the search it still appears to me to be products that aren't encyclopedic but I'm happy for it to be kept and worked on but it sure could use a lot of work as to me it still seems to have no content. Lympathy ^Talk 09:10, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please see our editing policy. Colonel Warden (talk) 12:38, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.