Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electronics circuit mini project on front door bell
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. CharlieEchoTango (contact) 01:31, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Electronics circuit mini project on front door bell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Wikipedia is not a guidebook or manual, or publisher of original research.--Pontificalibus (talk) 14:59, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This isn't even an article. North8000 (talk) 16:53, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, WP:NOTHOW. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:24, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:03, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Wikipedia is not a how to manual. It's times like this that I wish that we had a special speedy category for the blatant WP:NOT articles.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 21:01, 30 January 2012 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]
- Delete per nom. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:33, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete First, it is a "howto" article, failing WP:NOT. Second, it fails WP:N. Edison (talk) 05:34, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As per WP:NOT and WP:N. Osarius Talk 15:43, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.