Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electrostatic Magnefield Powered Engine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 is almost Singularity 08:33, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Electrostatic Magnefield Powered Engine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Wikipedia is not for things invented in school one day. Unsourced, non-notable. — Coren ^(talk) 02:52, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete Corpx 05:33, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete In this case it is so obviously nonsense that the speedy delete seems justified, and I'm not sure why the nom did not do that initially. Part of a number of equally absurd articles added today from the same source. DGG (talk) 08:38, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mostly because it was the first such article from that source I saw. And I agree it's full of hoaxy goodness, but there was a discussion very recently on CSD talk where concensus was that obvious hoaxes could not be speedied (even though I felt they should). — Coren ^(talk) 15:59, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. This does not meet the definition of patent nonsense or any of the other speedy criteria, so cannot be speedied. However this clearly does not meet notability criteria. Dsmdgold 12:49, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete per WP:MADEUP. --Targeman 14:53, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete per WP:MADEUP & WP:HOAX. Askari Mark (Talk) 18:28, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Of course neither of those are speedy deletion criteria. Dsmdgold 02:55, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • You're right; amended. Askari Mark (Talk) 22:08, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - This article advertises itsels as being subject to WP:MADEUP. --EMS | Talk 21:23, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete although it is very funny. Bearian 20:01, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.