Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Element Software

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:06, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Element Software

An issue of notability or none. The apple case study is interesting, but seems to be much more about how apple products helped a small company, rather than about the small company itself. Seems a borderline case, but IMHO this one thing is not enough to hang notability on. TexasAndroid (talk) 17:05, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:05, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:05, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – I was unable to find coverage of Element Software in any reliable sources. Since the case study is published by Apple for the purposes of promoting Apple, it cannot be considered an independent source. (It is in Apple's interest to make Element Software look important, and then say "Look at this important company which uses Apple products.") –Megaboz (talk) 15:49, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Megaboz--The Legendary Sky Attacker 00:55, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.