- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Can be revisited in a few months if the NBA career doesn't happen. Michig (talk) 07:02, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Elijah Stewart (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable college pumpkinbouncer Orange Mike | Talk 23:43, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:04, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:04, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
- Keep He is the school's all-time leading three-point scorer. Just finished Summer League and will be playing professionally somewhere next season, possibly in the NBA. The sources are there if you look for it. ~EDDY (talk/contribs)~ 02:27, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
- Keep the sources on the article demonstrate WP:GNG. Also, he has signed with the Indiana Pacers of the NBA, the deal just hasn’t been announced yet. I realize it wouldn’t play a game until the season starts in October, but seems dumb to delete in July. Rikster2 (talk) 10:15, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
- Draft The arguments to keep here largely rely on WP:CRYSTAL. It's fairly likely that he'll sign with some professional team, but I don't see enough coverage of his college career to justify an article if he never has any professional career. In a few months it will be clear. power~enwiki (π, ν) 01:40, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
- Weak keep To me it seems like the article barely meets WP:GNG. The sources, with the exception of the 4th one, seem to be reliable and independent enough to help contribute at least a little bit to the general notability guideline, and the topic is significantly covered in these sources. If keeping the article is not possible, I definitely support draftify over delete.--SkyGazer 512 Oh no, what did I do this time? 02:41, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.