Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ellen Gable

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Per WP:NPASR. (non-admin closure) —UY Scuti ^Talk 18:08, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ellen Gable

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I considered PRODing this but AfD may be better as I'm simply questioning the solidity of the listed Independent Award because my searches found nothing better than passing mentions at Books, News, browsers and Highbeam. It's also amusing this has stayed like this since starting in March 2008 so the time for attention is now. Notifying Tokyogirl79, DGG and LaMona who list to be notified of authors AfDs. SwisterTwister talk 22:55, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:56, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:56, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:56, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Almost unknown author, her most widely held novel is in only 12 libraries according to WorldCat. DGG ( talk ) 00:23, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment -- She seems to be high in her field in a small niche market, perhaps a kind of book that do not get inot mainstream libraries. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:54, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:48, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I did a little sourcing. More coverage in this search: [1]. She is taken seriously (sales, reputation) as a Catholic novelist with a following.E.M.Gregory (talk) 21:45, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment she is reviewed in Catholic Digest, as seen here: [2], [3], [4]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 07:53, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.