Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elliot joseph

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 11:01, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Elliot joseph

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cursory search for sources only turns up IMDB page, no indication of meeting WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 17:42, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 17:43, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete impossible to establish notability. Staszek Lem (talk) 17:44, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:07, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – at best, this looks like a case of WP:TOOSOON. But the other two projects Joseph has been involved with, So Awkward and Stardumb, themselves seem to rate no independent coverage. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 21:06, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; fails WP:GNG at its most basic level. One or two minor sources that do not establish notability. Best, FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 02:12, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails NACTOR. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 08:48, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.