- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:18, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Ellis Hicks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Wikipedia is WP:NOTGENEALOGY, and simply being a knight is hardly sufficient for WP:BIO. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:18, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Military, and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:19, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Not encyclopedic content. Kingsmasher678 (talk) 01:56, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: per nom. If anything, speedy delete for no credible claim of significance. C F A 💬 02:49, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I encourage everyone to check this forum post Microplastic Consumer (talk) 03:26, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:SIGCOV. Even if every thing is true, the coverage is sparse to the point that one source even questions his very existence. Bearian (talk) 02:08, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTGENEALOGY. Mztourist (talk) 09:54, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.