Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elvis Presley/Homosexuality

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was No Consensus, but for some reason the page redirected to a red link, so it was deleted. Redwolf24 (talk) 01:31, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Abusive, stealthy fork created to evade a current RfC and trigger keyword hits on Google, could be a speedy Wyss 21:22, 14 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Notice. As administrator User:DropDeadGorgias has suggested on the Talk:Elvis Presley page, I have created this new talk page summarizing the claims that Elvis had homosexual leanings in order to exclude this material from the main talk page. Onefortyone 21:49, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • That's a distortion. I suggested that if Wyss wanted to create an RFC about this subject, a subpage of the talk page should be created with the discussion points, rather than forcing new editors to look through the talk archives. Delete. --DropDeadGorgias (talk) 18:08, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You said,

I suggest that, rather than archiving the same recurrent discussion over again, we create a dedicated sub-page for the debate, like "Talk:Elvis Presley/Homosexuality," or something. That way, the discussion can rage on without cluttering the talk space and precluding any other discussion. --DropDeadGorgias (talk) 16:39, 14 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

See [1]. Sorry, if there was a misunderstanding. Onefortyone 23:20, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Userfy to the editor's userspace Ryan Norton ^{T | @ | C} 00:32, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment/request: please explain context why this is not appropriate for Talk space, and also note that one of the arguments for the move from VfD to AfD was that non-article-space pages would not have to be dealt with here. --MCB 02:06, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Note this was originally located at Elvis Presley/Homosexuality. If at all important it should've been mentioned in the main article. But I don't see how his sexuality is in any way relevant apart to those obsessed with the sexuality of celebrities. "I have seen evidence Bill Clinton was heterosexual. So what? I don't see the relevance. - Mgm|^(talk) 08:38, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

If David Bret is right, Elvis's homosexual leanings explain why his manager had such a strong influence on the singer. Onefortyone 21:53, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]