- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:28, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- EmForge (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested prod, reasoning was lack of reliable sources indicating notability; I'm inclined to agree. Falcon8765 (talk) 09:30, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as prodder. Unable to locate any reliable sources mentioning this site at all. --Cybercobra (talk) 09:33, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- There is also a significant conflict of interest issue considering the article's creator (User:Kwiecienm) --Cybercobra (talk) 09:39, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- And this has been deleted thrice before. Recommend WP:SALTing if outcome is deletion. --Cybercobra (talk) 09:49, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:03, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:03, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. Also please salt, per the article's history of deletions and recreations. This was also deleted via AfD on ru.wiki [1]. ThemFromSpace 00:21, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.