- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 09:16, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Emailbrain (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No reliable sources to establish notability per WP:GNG. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:03, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:05, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:06, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per nomination, and the fact that this seems to be a failed attempt to make notability. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 16:08, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 05:57, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No evidence that this company met the WP:CORPDEPTH criteria. AllyD (talk) 07:03, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Aside from this industry review, I found nothing reliable and third-party to establish notability. SwisterTwister talk 04:02, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.