Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emi coco

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:47, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Emi coco

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Refs consist of blogs and material submitted by article subject. No RS hits via Google, Bing, NYT or MS. GregJackP Boomer! 18:11, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This person may be notable someday but I see no indication of meeting WP:GNG. Mentions in magazines like Vogue aren't through stories but are through spotlights on readers. Ryan Vesey Review me! 19:11, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lithuania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:51, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:51, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:51, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not notable (yet). Mabalu (talk) 22:06, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Someday, perhaps notobility will come. Not now though. Capitalismojo (talk) 18:17, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG. There are not many notable results (in fact rarely few). Not notable enough. →TSU ^tp* 21:50, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non notable person ans as per above -- ÐℬigXЯaɣ 08:04, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.