- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy keep as per guidelines. Capitalistroadster 01:41, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete - Completely devoid of almost any information; valueless; poor grammar and spelling ("Espressionism"); what is "corrente"?; no links or explanations of terminology; etc. 216.194.4.255 05:24, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: this nomination was found in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Foundation for Civil Liberties. It's now in the correct spot. MER-C 05:27, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep, Emilio Vedova was not only one of the most significant figures of Italian avant-garde art of the immediate post-war period but also an artist whose continuing experiments with a wide range of diverse techniques and media exerted an enormous influence on subsequent generations of Italian artists. Demiurge 09:35, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep for God's sake! I have added a link to his bio at the Peggy Guggenheim Collection's site. I may add some more material, but anyways the guy is certainly notable. Just to give an idea of his fame and prestige, Luigi Nono composed an "Omaggio a Emilio Vedova" in 1957. Stammer 12:41, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Terence Ong 15:22, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep, all of nom's reasons are now invalid. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 00:29, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I do not see any valid reasons to delete presented.--Nick Y. 00:52, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.