Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eminem's enemies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. SushiGeek 07:27, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think WP is the place for listing people who dislike Eminem. It is probably very POV. Kilo-Lima|^(talk) 11:48, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as unencyclopedic. -- Kjkolb 13:19, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, unencyclopedic fancruft. Nothing worth keeping in this that can't go in Eminem. Daniel Case 13:39, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, rapcruft --Deville (Talk) 15:12, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep. The article appears to compile people who have been abused by Eminem, or abuse Eminem, in recorded songs. This would seem to be both verifiable and (insofar as any rap music is worthy of note) notable. Someone has taken the trouble to compile this information; it should be kept somewhere. Smerdis of Tlön 16:43, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unencyclopedic, eminemcruft. --Terence Ong 17:45, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Anything useful can go in Eminem. --Saforrest 18:40, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom etc. NTK 20:12, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• smerge. Probably worth noting in the main Eminem article that he's got peope who have disliked him enough to mention their dislike in songs. "Enemies" is too strong in any case for the vast majority of these. Youu can dislike someone without being their enemy. Grutness...wha? 00:18, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I just came across this article and I wanted to say that it seems pretty neutral and well documented to me. Plus its kind of interesting and it would make the main Eminem article too large if they was merged. I see no reason to delete. --Chris Brennan 00:42, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete ue Admrb♉ltz (T | C) 07:44, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. please don't delete I found this article to be very interesting and relevant in being an archive. And i seeno reason to delete. --manuni 20:20, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep. Eminem is noteworthy for having been involved in several feuds. The information contained within ought to be maintained in some place (and updated, for what it's worth). I'm not sure it mandates its own article, but at the same time there's probably more information worthy of inclusion than would fit in the main article on Eminem. I recommend a rename to "Eminem's Feuds" or something along those lines. - RPIRED 02:40, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.