Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Empire of Iuz (3rd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Flanaess. Nja247 19:24, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Empire of Iuz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No outside sources or evidence of independent notability. We're not a dedicated D&D wiki, and something this in-universe would only be valid there. Ironholds (talk) 14:50, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, or Merge to Flanaess. BOZ (talk) 15:09, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- AfD isn't a vote; mind giving reasoning? Ironholds (talk) 15:10, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Because there was discussion to merge it before, but it never happened, so might as well make it stick this time? I'm otherwise fine with keeping, though. BOZ (talk) 15:14, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- AfD isn't a vote; mind giving reasoning? Ironholds (talk) 15:10, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Flanaess or Iuz; probably lacks enough real-world notability to justify having its own article, but a good bit of this could be merged per WP:PRESERVE and WP:PNJCS. The Dungeons & Dragons WikiProject has been working on merging relevant content from this sort of article into better "list of..." type pages; we just haven't gotten to this one yet. The talk page actually has old merge discussion that was never finished, and at one time this had been redirected, but that was reverted. I will happily merge the content as soon as this discussion is over, unless the article is deleted. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 15:47, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge Seems appropriate, and we have members of the project willing to do the job.--Cube lurker (talk) 15:52, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per recent consensous in D&D-land that this type of thing is good to merge. I'd prefer the merge target be some Greyhawk geographic article, but I'll defer to others on what the merge target should be. Hobit (talk) 19:12, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Flanaess. ;) BOZ (talk) 19:36, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah, A) I should read the above. B) I should know that. Had the map of Greyhawk on my ceiling as a kid. Hobit (talk) 15:29, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Flanaess. ;) BOZ (talk) 19:36, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.