Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/End-To-End Reconfigurability

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete as copyright violation. It's a straight copy and paste of at least two papers on this subject, concatenated together. See here, here, and here. Given that Mplampla (talk · contribs) passed off other people's work as xyr own when writing the article text, I don't believe xyr assertions that the images were xyr own work. So I've deleted those, too. Uncle G (talk) 17:36, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

End-To-End Reconfigurability (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Unencyclopedic, and advertisement-like. No independent reliable sources. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 16:35, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom, borderline speedy as advert, and possible copyvio. Stifle (talk) 17:06, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It was originaly tagged as speedy - advert, but the tag was removed by a new editors first edit. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 17:07, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• This Article is just a demonstration of a European Commission funded research project and has nothing to do with an advertisement. Fontas (talk) 17:33, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.