Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Engineering Equation Solver
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 00:31, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Engineering Equation Solver (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Delete no indication that this software is notable and only bare context enough to know that it's software to solve equations, but not where its made how its used or any realworld notability Carlossuarez46 (talk) 22:42, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 22:52, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Only created today but could be speedy under A1 no context. 16x9 (talk) 23:15, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep it is mentioned in a wp:rs http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-61863790.html BUT obviously it needs a lto of work Greglocock (talk) 02:01, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- A mere mention is hardly the significant coverage in reliable third party sources. I am mentioned in a reliable source: the telephone directory, doesn't make me notable either. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 05:55, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Understood. But, by my reading, one RS is sufficient. Not that I give a monkey's in this case, but I think you are creating policy on the fly. Greglocock (talk) 07:26, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- A mere mention is hardly the significant coverage in reliable third party sources. I am mentioned in a reliable source: the telephone directory, doesn't make me notable either. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 05:55, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:54, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Simply not an article. Could probably have been prodded. Artw (talk) 05:58, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete under WP:CSD#A1. Matt (talk) 04:00, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete. See above comment.--E8 (talk) 05:58, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22Engineering+Equation+Solver%22+%22software%22&btnG=Search returns a lot of hits. Its mentioned at a lot of place, but I don't spot any major review sites. Dream Focus 18:07, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.