- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WP:SNOW MBisanz talk 06:06, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Englesi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Prod contested with the rationale, "This language is still being developed. Within 5-6 months, it will be a notable language." Therefore Delete for now, with no prejudice against recreation in 5-6 months, that is, after the language has become notable. Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 01:46, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for 5-6 months per lack of reliable sources for the language. I have no problem with recreating the article in a few months IF the language becomes notable. Timmeh! 01:52, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for WP:CRYSTAL. The article states that version 2 may not be complete ...within the next few months or even in five years. Pah! Eddie.willers (talk) 01:59, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for obvious reasons, such as, really, lack of existence. Drmies (talk) 02:01, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete May not be complete within the next few months or even in five years no, just no... - 2 ... says you, says me, suggestion box 02:10, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - admittedly not notable. Recreate if and when it becomes notable. LadyofShalott Weave 02:37, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete; no assertion of notability. Wikipedia is not a place to post your half-baked ideas. Ironholds (talk) 03:08, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.