Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/English Shieldwall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:25, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

English Shieldwall (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable subject. Article cites no reliable secondary sources. Unable to find sources to improve the article. NotFromUtrecht (talk) 18:19, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. No third party reliable sources found. In the absence of such this group fails WP:V and WP:N. RichardOSmith (talk) 18:31, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:13, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - No coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. -- Joaquin008 ^(talk) 19:19, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.