- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 12:36, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable, obscure slave trader. Delete. —EdGl 23:39, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- No Vote If the part about his diary being published is true, I'd say keep. Nothing on Google, but then Google isn't the best source for this sort of thing. Can anyone verify? Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 23:47, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I find a reference to it on Google Books (Philip D. Curtin: The Rise and Fall of the Plantation Complex: Essays in Atlantic History, p. 181) and it appears to be one of few surviving records of African slave traders. Obviously an importance source. up+l+and 23:56, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Are you going to add it to the article, then? —EdGl 00:04, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete if not expanded. The book might be notable, but not the man. --Dhartung | Talk 01:18, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Seems he is more often called Antera Duke --HJMG 07:48, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 19:29, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and fix it up. I agree with up+l+and on the subject's notability. Em-jay-es 16:05, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Uppland it looks interesting but is in need of references. Yamaguchi先生 21:28, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.