Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enterprise Learning Strategy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:36, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Enterprise Learning Strategy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

mere list of business jargon dicdefs. DGG ( talk ) 04:10, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I happen to notice this earlier, nothing at all acceptable and convincing. Notifying taggers HappyValleyEditor and IagoQnsi. SwisterTwister talk 04:15, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 04:15, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:57, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It reads like it was written by paid editors, or as an ad. It might fall under WP:G11. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Calicodragon (talk • contribs) 01:54, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agree, the content is a bunch of jargon and could have been written by paid editors or advertisers. Also, I could find no acceptable independent sources that discuss this subject. And, it seems there is no clear definition or description of what this is anyway, in the business jargon world on the web --Steve Quinn (talk) 04:42, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.