Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enterprise Markup Language

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 03:12, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Enterprise Markup Language (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Potentially non notable markup language. The author, a new editor, was unfamiliar with our notability guidelines, and once I had explained them, admitted that it may not be notable. As such, I am bringing it here so that a wider audience can offer their opinions. J Milburn (talk) 21:33, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Got nothing resembling a reliable source in Gsearches for "Enterprise Markup Language" (web, books, news, and scholar). Therefore fails WP:N and likely also fails WP:V. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 21:56, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - I see no evidence of notability. So far, EML is a little-used markup language. No prejudice against recreation if notability is established in the future. —Travis^talk 22:00, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- -- pb30<talk> 03:40, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.