Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enuff Said Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sango123 23:46, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

zero non-Wikipedia ghits JianLi 17:40, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I have been watching this one since its inception, waiting for them to come up with anything notable about it. Viridae^Talk 23:40, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, doesn't assert notability. -/- Warren 04:24, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom.--Fuhghettaboutit 04:26, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete nn Nick Catalano _contrib ^talk 04:29, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Delete — WP:NN Betacommand 05:01, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. -- Gogo Dodo 05:24, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, apparent vanity article (editor who authored it shares a name with one of the label's "founders"), and I couldn't find anything verifiable on any of the three records listed in the article, much less on the label itself. -- H·G (^words/_works) 05:59, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete — per nom., fails WP:CORP --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 06:53, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Per everyone else. You would think "one of the most influential crews of the entire rap game" would at least have a website! Morgan Wick 01:31, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Warrens. In very bad shape, non-notable record label/movement, and a search brings up almost nothing related to the article. --S-man 19:17, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.