Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Environmental Movement as a Collection of Problem Solvers
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Johnleemk | Talk 12:22, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Original research. The creator admits this in the inital edit summary. Sorry, but WP should not be used as a soapbox. hateless 19:35, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Yes there is some original research in the article, but from the viewpoint of the very established field of process management, the basic tenants are sound. Perhaps you could suggest a way to improve the article so that it is acceptable? Jack Harich 19:45, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Removing *every* bit of original research and citing established sources is the way. Equendil 19:55, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nomination unless content drastically changed. Equendil 19:55, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Equendil. I will read up on Wikipedia's policies and rework the entry. Jack Harich 19:58, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I spent an enjoyable and educational hour reading Wikipedia's policies on encyclopedia articles. I was especially interested in what the spirit of these policies was. Based on this, I agree that this article, my first, should be deleted. Thanks for steering me straight and helping me to go through one of the many processes that allow Wikipedia to be the truly valuable resource it is. Jack Harich 21:47, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.