Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Envy (MC / Rapper)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Keep - appears to meet notability and ref's (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 19:13, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Envy (MC / Rapper) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article appears to be promotion. the artist hasn't released any reliable material yet, s she fails WP:N. Two quotes are not enough to establish notability. DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 21:45, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Envy (MC / Rapper) probably needs a rename. This is the source already in the article, from The Guardian: http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2008/oct/06/new.band.envy Someone with that many words in the Guardian is going to be notable, and indeed there is coverage in Plan B, HHC, RWD etc. 86.44.24.146 (talk) 05:00, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 14:06, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — Gongshow Talk 16:59, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Both articles above are significant coverage, both are reliable sources. Subject therefore meets both WP:GNG and WP:BAND #1.--Michig (talk) 19:03, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Snow/Speedy Keep. Just a suggestion -- if the nom is agreeable at this point to this closing as a snow/speedy keep (given that all others are unanimous that it is a keep), or withdrawing it, that might perhaps save some people some time.--Epeefleche (talk) 16:09, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.