- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 17:17, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Entry is a dictionary definition. Deprodded on the pretense of being and "interesting" dicdef, and subsequently brought here. Kuzaar 14:43, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Whoopsy daisy, go figure, it was transwikied out of Wiktionary. Small wonder this article doesn't seem to belong in an encyclopedia. I'm going to recommend giving this a Merge into Figure of Speech Kuzaar 14:53, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I think you mean transwikied into Wiktionary, which is what I did a couple of days ago. I could see an article written on this -- similar to an article on Simile or Metaphor, perhaps, although this is not as well known -- so this is actually one of the prods I felt least confident about after prodding a bunch I transwikied. TheProject 15:04, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom. BigE1977 15:48, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:WINAD. Stifle (talk) 19:50, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete. Sounds like an interesting expandable article, but now it's just a dicdef. Fagstein 21:34, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom. San Saba 03:09, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.