Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Era Tak (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted‎ by DoubleGrazing (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) as "Multiple reasons: speedy deletion criteria G4, G11". It has also been (ECP) salted. (non-admin closure) WCQuidditch 11:41, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Era Tak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This has been moved all over the place. I don't believe draftification is appropriate. Not shown to pass any notability criteria. Fails WP:BIO. Sources appear to be PR/churnalism. Being invited to literature festivals is not a token of notability. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 09:35, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.