- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 20:48, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Eraye (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. Eraye skincare matches no google news articles so there is little likelihood of establishing satisfactory notability. There are no sources for the claims made and the article has been tagged for re-write for 3 years. Ash (talk) 04:00, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 22:04, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete; possible hoax; certainly I can't find any reliable sources and consider it fails WP:V. If it existed, a high priced cosmetic used by celebrities would surely have significant coverage. Smile a While (talk) 20:23, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.