- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. While the tool looks nifty, lacks suitable coverage. LFaraone 00:02, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Es shell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability under WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH, as it applies to products. Googling suggests the sources simply don't exist. While the term "ES shell" does turn up in the literature, it's usually a reference to an "expert system shell", not this software. All the sources I was able to find discussing this software were either primary or trivial. Msnicki (talk) 19:49, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Msnicki (talk) 20:28, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Msnicki (talk) 20:28, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment – This source has a one paragraph description. Regards, RJH (talk) 22:08, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 21:56, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 03:05, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The article does not contain the references to substantial reliable third party coverage required for inclusion. Sandstein 11:41, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.