Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Escape to donegal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 21:55, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Escape to donegal

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NFF, this has only recently entered production, and the production itself is not notable. Wait until they're in post-production to add it. —ShadowRanger ^(talk|stalk) 22:58, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nom - for reasons given above. —ShadowRanger ^(talk|stalk) 22:59, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, WP:NFF is clear about pre-release, and the production itself is not notable, no coverage except press releases from February 2009. A Wiki article should wait for the film's release. Chuckiesdad/Talk/Contribs 23:06, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - this film is produced by Jeffrey Wetzel who produced THE HANGOVER. this is a major motion picture with a major star. (Alan Cumming) See IMDB page. this film was featured in VARIETY earlier this year - WikiEditor20100 —Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiEditor20100 (talk • contribs) 23:26, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - You still haven't said how the production itself is notable. Has anything happened in the production that would have notability? You need to read WP:NFF, then, if you still believe this is notable, explain why this film is an exception to the general rule that films still in production do not get articles. Is this film magically immune to being scrapped? Did one of the stars throw a hissy fit about their role? Or is it just like most productions where there is little to no news aside from press releases and puff pieces that tell you little except how much star power it has? —ShadowRanger ^(talk|stalk) 00:10, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for reasons given. Eeekster (talk) 02:47, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom Cynof Gavuf 10:24, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and above; pretty sure notability isn't transitive in that way. If it isn't notable in itself... SMC (talk) 10:53, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep: Per [1], [2], [3], and [4]. Joe Chill (talk) 20:34, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Alan Cumming per WP:NFF. Cerebellum (talk) 22:13, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.