- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –MuZemike 23:41, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Esh (Unix) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH, as it applies to products. Googling suggests they don't exist. Msnicki (talk) 19:55, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Msnicki (talk) 20:28, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Msnicki (talk) 20:28, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect – Well it does exist and I can find a couple of valid independent book sources that mention it. But there's no substantial information, so I recommend redirecting to Unix shell and adding a one-liner description there. Regards, RJH (talk) 22:05, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Care to post those sources? – Pnm (talk) 00:19, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Unless sources suggest otherwise, this is a non-notable shell and would be indiscriminate detail in the list at Unix shell. I could only find primary sources, and one sentence in this book. – Pnm (talk) 00:19, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.