Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eskilstuna Energy and Environment
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 23:04, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Eskilstuna Energy and Environment (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article appears to be primarily promotional for the corporation and lacks significant notability WP:GNG. Chiserc (talk) 23:49, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Sweden. Chiserc (talk) 23:49, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. As it stands, there is no indicia of encyclopedic notability given the absence of sources supporting this article. BD2412 T 02:38, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete for lack of sources. I’m getting the idea that this is a local utility with a good PR guy. Bearian (talk) 06:43, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
- Keep if someone steps up to fix it or Delete per WP:TNT. Clearly passes WP:ORGCRIT if one searches under its actual name in Swedish which is Eskilstuna Energi & Miljö. There is WP:SIGCOV in google books and google scholar (see [1], [2]). Best.4meter4 (talk) 14:49, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.