- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Petros471 12:11, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Seems to be a hoax. No Google results related to this (for example, see [1] which is a refined search to show only the most relevant results - and even those don't contain any references to this "language". PeepP 13:43, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No sources, seems made up... Wickethewok 14:22, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete hoax Tom Harrison Talk 14:40, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete My request for sources for this information was ignored. Appears to be a hoax unless the author can find the books or other reference materials upon which they drew in order to create the article. (aeropagitica) (talk) 15:48, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.