• Home
  • Random
  • Nearby
  • Log in
  • Settings
Donate Now If Wikipedia is useful to you, please give today.
  • About Wikipedia
  • Disclaimers
Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Espond

  • Project page
  • Talk
  • Language
  • Watch
  • Edit
< Wikipedia:Articles for deletion
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 08:40, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Espond

edit
Espond (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

prod removed, thus listed here. Neologism, self-invented word Passportguy (talk) 20:44, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Neologism WP:MADEUP, dictionary definition WP:NOTDICTIONARY. Vicenarian (T · C) 20:49, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - WP:MADEUP, WP:NOTDICTIONARY. Highest Heights (talk) 20:52, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:NEO. Cunard (talk) 20:52, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't even know that existed! Yes, per WP:NEO, too. Vicenarian (T · C) 20:57, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'd like to call WP:SNOW on this one.... Vicenarian (T · C) 21:01, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, per WP:NEO and WP:SNOW too. Highest Heights (talk) 21:02, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I do not see how WP:SNOW applies here because nothing has happened to the article yet. The WP:NOTDICTIONARY holds the most weight so unless some reliable sources are introduced to challenge the WP:NEO argument then I would have to recommend this article be deleted. However, if the sources are provided then per NOTDICTIONARY it should be transwiki'd to wiktionary. ZabMilenko 21:30, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Er, I thought WP:SNOW was invoked to indicate something is pretty much a foregone conclusion (such as the deletion of this article) and debate isn't really all that necessary? Maybe I brought it out too soon. PS: Google it, it's already in the Urban Dictionary. Vicenarian (T · C) 21:34, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete it's snowing, Vicenarian understand snow. Duffbeerforme (talk) 21:46, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Snowball delete per above. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 22:24, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Snowball delete. Non-notable made-up neologism. Dawn Bard (talk) 15:10, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Espond&oldid=1070191585"
Last edited on 6 February 2022, at 05:50

Languages

      This page is not available in other languages.

      Wikipedia
      • Wikimedia Foundation
      • Powered by MediaWiki
      • This page was last edited on 6 February 2022, at 05:50 (UTC).
      • Content is available under CC BY-SA 4.0 unless otherwise noted.
      • Privacy policy
      • About Wikipedia
      • Disclaimers
      • Contact Wikipedia
      • Code of Conduct
      • Developers
      • Statistics
      • Cookie statement
      • Terms of Use
      • Desktop