Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ess copy services
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. RasputinAXP c 04:01, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not exactly sure what this is selling, but I recognize marketingspeak when I see it. This is an ad for services, and thus inappropriate and unencyclopedic. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 09:52, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as advertising Kevin 10:13, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I have no idea what's going on in this article, but I'm pretty sure it's not notable. -- Kicking222 13:48, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. It appears the original author works for the company who graciously gave permission for material from their website to be used. Paddles 14:20, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom; set this adspam on fire. RGTraynor 14:45, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this is a subuset of IBM's Enterprise Storage Services architecture, it's an add-on that provides real-time data asecurity, I think (that's from memory, I no longer work for an IBM Business Partner). Not independently notable, I think. Actually it might well be (i.e. it might just be justifiable to have an article separate from ESS), but this is just copy & paste adcrap, so no loss. Just zis Guy you know? 20:12, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Marketing rubbish, though what it's trying to sell I'm not sure. - Richardcavell 23:03, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.