- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. No notability demonstrated. Black Kite 23:28, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Eternal Wars (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No assertion of notability (WP:N), no references independent or otherwise (WP:V). Web search shows the usual bevy of directory entries and forum discussion; nothing to satisfy notability guidelines. As a browser-based game it may qualify for speedy A7, but I wanted to give it a chance here. Marasmusine (talk) 12:56, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. Marasmusine (talk) 13:32, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete A search turns up no reliable sources to demonstrate notability, just the myriad listing sites and forum posts. Someoneanother 23:48, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Fails to pass the general notability guideline because there are no reliable third party sources that significantly cover this online game. Randomran (talk) 17:03, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.