Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ethereal Pandemonium

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 00:23, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ethereal Pandemonium

Fails WP:MUSIC and WP:RS. No sources given at all. It's been orphaned since June. It is horribly written which, given that standpoint, if the band were notable after all, it would be best to delete this and start over. But, as it stands, this band is not notable. Delete Undead Warrior (talk) 06:12, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Undead Warrior (talk) 06:12, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: notability not established, as per WP:MUSIC. JamesBurns (talk) 23:17, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per James Burns. -- MISTER ALCOHOL ^T ^C 04:00, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete per nom. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL (talk) 21:50, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- For some reason this article was missing the AfD tag. It's now been added. JamesBurns (talk) 08:15, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:09, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 14:36, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Slovakia-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 14:36, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.