Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eugene Backwoods

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.--Kubigula (talk) 03:17, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Eugene Backwoods

Not a notable name, no source for made up term Aboutmovies (talk) 05:02, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nominator. Aboutmovies (talk) 05:02, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Contested prod. Neologism, only one Google hit, from a bulletin board. All original research and no assertion of notability. Katr67 (talk) 05:46, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Do not delete Wikipedias deletion policy states clearly that "Pages that can be improved should be edited or tagged, not nominated for deletion". Furthermore; as a resident of Eugene, I would like to contest the notion that "Eugene Backwoods" is not a noteable name. As only parts of the forest are officially named, the term "Eugene backwoods" is often heard by people in and around Eugene.
- That's the point. Most people here don't think it can be improved. JuJube (talk) 07:56, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A locally used term is not one that meets notability guidelines. Unless it can be sourced, I would say it needs to go. Slavlin (talk) 02:45, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non notable ___location. Marlith ^T/C 02:46, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete neologism. JuJube (talk) 07:56, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.