Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eugene C. Pulliam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is to Keep (non-admin closure)Davey2010Talk 22:39, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Eugene C. Pulliam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Person does not appear to be notable, nor do I believe most of this material is verifiable. Article is completely unsourced, and has been since October 2007. Cursory google searching results for 'Eugene Collins Pulliam' are articles about his son and genealogy data. PeterTheFourth (talk) 23:08, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 23:21, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 23:21, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 23:21, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kansas-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 23:21, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep/ I've added references to articles at the Indiana Journalism Hall of Fame website and in the Encyclopedia of American Journalism which should be enough to establish his notability. Indyguy (talk) 02:21, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.