Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eugene Mitchell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sort of WP:SOFTDELETE given the low input. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:14, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Eugene Mitchell

Eugene Mitchell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability absent. The subject is no more than the nephew of the author of a single famous work. He did no more than leave money from his estate to a couple of donees. If WP recognises this subject as notable, then anyone with a few bucks to give away becomes worthy of notice, notwithstanding having done nothing whatsoever of particular note during their lifetime. sirlanz 23:43, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: I have given this AfD the standard formatting. No opinion at this time. --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:04, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:31, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:31, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete nephews of notable writers are not notable for such alone, even if they were estate administrators. Just nothing at all notable here.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:21, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:59, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:11, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.