Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Euler–Worpitzky–Chen polynomials

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 01:20, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Euler–Worpitzky–Chen polynomials (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

There are no sources to indicate the notability of these polynomials. Statements like the following strongly suggest that the subject of the article is original research:

"The Euler–Worpitzky–Chen polynomials are possibly new. The present author learned them from Peter Luschny in 2008."

Finally, there are apparently no relevant scholar hits containing the words Euler Worpitzky Chen polynomials, which suggests that even if the subject of the article is not original research (doubtful), the title of the article is a WP:NEOLOGISM. siℓℓy rabbit (talk) 23:49, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, I can't find anything in MathSciNet either. Wikipedia is not a place to publish original research. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 13:57, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, not much understanding of maths past algebra in my head, but I understand No Original Research quite well. Nyttend (talk) 14:50, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.